Judicial Appeal of State Indiscretion

There must be a judicial area to bring matters of state to. I could not, and would not, sue the US Government or a department of government for their actions, with the intent of winning a change in organization or recording of policy. I would expect the ABA or ACLU or another judicial appelate group to win such a case in a trial. But who would the defendant truly be, and where would these two meet? I do not accept fiat government.

We also should consider looking at the legal apparatus behind the Federal Reserve. They are a private company with private holders. They won the power to print money in 1913, and should not have this over a state or a people. >100% of our recent fiscal expansion has been debt.

Your Friend,
William Bunker

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 22:50:39 -0400, "Noam Chomsky"
said:
> Of course it is scandalous. Exactly how to proceed to deal with this is
> not
> a trivial question. One can't bring issues to the Supreme Court.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Subject: Israel and the NSA
>
>
> >I am confused as to why Israel is given NSA information. This should be
> > reviewed by the Supreme Court and actions should be taken to restore the
> > 4th amendment.
> >
> > Thank you for your consideration,
> > William Bunker

===

The people must have a more active role in modifying the state than through petition to their elected officials. The people should have the power to organize and argue for their rights with force and consequence in courts of law on the actions of government. This will make anyone a king and decentralize power from those who would lord it over others.